4.8 Article

Suppressing the Loss of Ultracold Molecules Via the Continuous Quantum Zeno Effect

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.070404

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIST
  2. NSF-PIF
  3. ARO
  4. ARO-DARPA-OLE
  5. AFOSR
  6. NRC
  7. NDSEG
  8. NSF
  9. NCAR
  10. CU
  11. [JILA-NSF-PFC-1125844]
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  13. Division Of Physics [1211914] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  15. Division Of Physics [1125844] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate theoretically the suppression of two-body losses when the on-site loss rate is larger than all other energy scales in a lattice. This work quantitatively explains the recently observed suppression of chemical reactions between two rotational states of fermionic KRb molecules confined in one-dimensional tubes with a weak lattice along the tubes [Yan et al., Nature (London) 501, 521 (2013)]. New loss rate measurements performed for different lattice parameters but under controlled initial conditions allow us to show that the loss suppression is a consequence of the combined effects of lattice confinement and the continuous quantum Zeno effect. A key finding, relevant for generic strongly reactive systems, is that while a single-band theory can qualitatively describe the data, a quantitative analysis must include multiband effects. Accounting for these effects reduces the inferred molecule filling fraction by a factor of 5. A rate equation can describe much of the data, but to properly reproduce the loss dynamics with a fixed filling fraction for all lattice parameters we develop a mean-field model and benchmark it with numerically exact time-dependent density matrix renormalization group calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available