4.4 Article

RIG-I and TLR3 are both required for maximum interferon induction by influenza virus in human lung alveolar epithelial cells

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 482, Issue -, Pages 181-188

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.03.048

Keywords

RIG-I; TLR3; Interferon; Influenza; A549; AEC; PR8; Human; Lung; Innate immunity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [5U19A1062629, 5U19 AI62629]
  2. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
  3. Merit Review Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  4. National Institutes of Health [1 I01 BX001937]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U19AI062629] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM103648] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. Veterans Affairs [I01BX001937] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pattern recognition receptors, such as retinoic acid-inducible protein I (RIG-I), Toll-like receptors 3 and 7 (TLR3 and 7), and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing protein 2 (NOD2), play important roles in the recognition of influenza A virus (IAV), but their role in interferon (IFN) induction is still unclear, particularly in human lung. We investigated IFN induction by IAV in the A549 cell line as well as in primary human alveolar epithelial cells (AEC). TLR3/7, NOD2, RIG-I, and IFN expression levels were measured by qRT-PCR and ELISA in cells infected with IAV PR8. We found that TLR7 and NOD2 were not involved in IFN induction by IAV in these cells. Neither RIG-I nor TLR3 siRNA alone completely blocked IFN induction. However, double knockdown of RIG-I and TLR3 completely inhibited IFN induction by influenza. Thus, signaling through both RIG-I and TLR3 is important for IFN induction by IAV in human lung AEC. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available