4.8 Article

Measurement of the W Boson Mass with the D0 Detector

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 108, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.151804

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE
  2. NSF (USA)
  3. CEA
  4. CNRS/IN2P3
  5. CIMENT
  6. Grenoble (France)
  7. MON
  8. Rosatom
  9. RFBR (Russia)
  10. CNPq
  11. FAPERJ
  12. FAPESP
  13. FUNDUNESP (Brazil)
  14. DAE
  15. DST (India)
  16. Colciencias (Colombia)
  17. CONACyT (Mexico)
  18. NRF (Korea)
  19. FOM (The Netherlands)
  20. STFC
  21. Royal Society (United Kingdom)
  22. MSMT
  23. GACR (Czech Republic)
  24. BMBF
  25. DFG (Germany)
  26. SFI (Ireland)
  27. Swedish Research Council (Sweden)
  28. CAS
  29. CNSF (China)
  30. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  31. STFC [ST/K50208X/1, PP/E000487/1, ST/F00754X/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/H00095X/1, ST/J501074/1, ST/K000713/1, ST/M000664/1, ST/H00095X/2, ST/K001388/1, ST/I505756/1, ST/K001604/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  32. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00095X/2, ST/K001604/1 CMS Upgrade, ST/K001604/1 SuperNEMO, ST/K001604/1 LHCb, PP/E000487/1, ST/M000664/1, ST/J501074/1, ST/K001604/1 T2K, ST/H00095X/1, ST/K001604/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/K50208X/1, ST/K000713/1, PP/D004284/1, ST/K001388/1, ST/K001604/1 DMUK, ST/K001604/1 LHCb Upgrades, ST/K001604/1 GRIDPP, ST/K001604/1 MICE/UKNF, ST/F00754X/1, ST/I505756/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a measurement of the W boson mass using data corresponding to 4: 3 fb(-1) of integrated luminosity collected with the D0 detector during Run II at the Fermilab Tevatron p (p) over tilde collider. With a sample of 1 677 394 W -> e nu candidate events, we measure M-W = 80.367 +/- 0.026 GeV. This result is combined with an earlier D0 result determined using an independent Run II data sample, corresponding to 1 fb(-1) of integrated luminosity, to yield MW 80.375 +/- 0.023 GeV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available