4.8 Article

Thickness-Dependent Polarization of Strained BiFeO3 Films with Constant Tetragonality

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 109, Issue 26, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.267601

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CEA Ph.D. grant CFR
  2. ANR
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11274222]
  4. ARO [W911NF-12-1-0085]
  5. ONR [N00014-11-1-0384, N00014-12-1-1034, N00014-08-1-091, N00014-07-1-0825]
  6. DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [ER-46612]
  7. NSF [DMR-1066158, DMR-0701558]
  8. MRI [0722625]
  9. DOD
  10. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  11. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0959124] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Division Of Materials Research
  13. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1066158] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Office Of The Director
  15. EPSCoR [0918970] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the ferroelectric polarization of BiFeO3 films down to 3.6 nm using low energy electron and photoelectron emission microscopy. The measured polarization decays strongly below a critical thickness of 5-7 nm predicted by continuous medium theory whereas the tetragonal distortion does not change. We resolve this apparent contradiction using first-principles-based effective Hamiltonian calculations. In ultrathin films, the energetics of near open circuit electrical boundary conditions, i.e., an unscreened depolarizing field, drive the system through a phase transition from single out-of-plane polarization to nanoscale stripe domains. It gives rise to an average polarization close to zero as measured by the electron microscopy while maintaining the relatively large tetragonal distortion imposed by the nonzero polarization state of each individual domain. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.267601

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available