4.8 Article

Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of Milky Way Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 107, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.241302

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. LAT
  2. NASA, United States
  3. DOE, United States
  4. CEA/Irfu, France
  5. IN2P3/CNRS in France
  6. ASI, Italy
  7. INFN, Italy
  8. MEXT, Japan
  9. KEK, Japan
  10. JAXA, Japan
  11. K.A. Wallenberg Foundation
  12. Swedish Research Council
  13. National Space Board in Sweden
  14. INAF in Italy
  15. CNES in France
  16. NASA [NNX09AD09G]
  17. NASA [120339, NNX09AD09G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  18. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [10J08529] Funding Source: KAKEN
  19. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  20. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  21. Division Of Physics [0855462] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Satellite galaxies of the Milky Way are among the most promising targets for dark matter searches in gamma rays. We present a search for dark matter consisting of weakly interacting massive particles, applying a joint likelihood analysis to 10 satellite galaxies with 24 months of data of the Fermi Large Area Telescope. No dark matter signal is detected. Including the uncertainty in the dark matter distribution, robust upper limits are placed on dark matter annihilation cross sections. The 95% confidence level upper limits range from about 10(-26) cm(3) s(-1) at 5 GeV to about 5 x 10(-23) cm(3) s(-1) at 1 TeV, depending on the dark matter annihilation final state. For the first time, using gamma rays, we are able to rule out models with the most generic cross section (similar to 3 x 10(-26) cm(3) s(-1) for a purely s-wave cross section), without assuming additional boost factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available