4.8 Article

Search for a Fourth Generation t′ Quark in p(p)over-bar Collisions at √s=1.96 TeV

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.082001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE, USA
  2. NSF, USA
  3. CEA, France
  4. CNRS/IN2P3, France
  5. FASI, Russia
  6. RFBR, Russia
  7. CNPq, Brazil
  8. FAPERJ, Brazil
  9. FAPESP, Brazil
  10. FUNDUNESP, Brazil
  11. DAE, India
  12. DST, India
  13. Colciencias, Colombia
  14. CONACyT, Mexico
  15. KRF, Korea
  16. KOSEF, Korea
  17. CONICET, Argentina
  18. UBACyT, Argentina
  19. FOM (The Netherlands)
  20. STFC, United Kingdom
  21. Royal Society, United Kingdom
  22. MSMT, Czech Republic
  23. GACR, Czech Republic
  24. CRC Program
  25. NSERC (Canada)
  26. BMBF, Germany
  27. DFG, Germany
  28. SFI, Ireland
  29. Swedish Research Council (Sweden)
  30. CAS, China
  31. CNSF, China
  32. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00095X/2, PP/E000487/1, ST/J501074/1, ST/H00095X/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/I505756/1, ST/F00754X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  33. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  34. STFC [PP/E000487/1, ST/F00754X/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/H00095X/1, ST/J501074/1, ST/H00095X/2, ST/I505756/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a search for pair production of a fourth generation t' quark and its antiparticle, followed by their decays to a W boson and a jet, based on an integrated luminosity of 5: 3 fb(-1) of proton-antiproton collisions at root s = 1.96 TeV collected by the D0 Collaboration at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. We set upper limits on the t'(t) over bar' production cross section that exclude at the 95% C. L. a t' quark that decays exclusively to W + jet with a mass below 285 GeV. We observe a small excess in the mu + jets channel which reduces the mass range excluded compared to the expected limit of 320 GeV in the absence of a signal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available