4.8 Article

Limits on Neutrino Emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts with the 40 String IceCube Detector

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 106, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.141101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. NSF-Office of Polar Programs
  2. U.S. NSF-Physics Division
  3. University of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  4. GLOW and OSG grids
  5. U.S. DOE
  6. NERSCC
  7. LONI grid
  8. NSERC, Canada
  9. Swedish Research Council
  10. Swedish Polar Research Secretariat
  11. SNIC
  12. K. and A. Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden
  13. German Ministry for Education and Research
  14. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  15. FSR
  16. FWO Odysseus
  17. IWT
  18. BELSPO, Belgium
  19. Marsden Fund, New Zealand
  20. JSPS, Japan
  21. SNSF, Switzerland
  22. EU
  23. Capes Foundation, Brazil
  24. NSF GRFP
  25. STFC [ST/J000507/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  26. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J000507/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  27. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  28. Division Of Physics [0969661, 0856253, 757155] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  29. Division Of Physics
  30. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0855486, 757759, 969061] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IceCube has become the first neutrino telescope with a sensitivity below the TeV neutrino flux predicted from gamma-ray bursts if gamma-ray bursts are responsible for the observed cosmic-ray flux above 10(18) eV. Two separate analyses using the half-complete IceCube detector, one a dedicated search for neutrinos from p gamma interactions in the prompt phase of the gamma-ray burst fireball and the other a generic search for any neutrino emission from these sources over a wide range of energies and emission times, produced no evidence for neutrino emission, excluding prevailing models at 90% confidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available