4.8 Article

Search for a Higgs Boson Decaying to Two W Bosons at CDF

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.021802

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation
  7. A.P. Sloan Foundation
  8. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  9. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation
  10. Korean Research Foundation
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council and the Royal Society, UK
  12. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS
  13. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  14. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain
  15. Slovak RD Agency
  16. Academy of Finland
  17. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E000444/1, PP/D003199/1, PPA/A/S/2003/00461/2, PP/E000452/1, ST/H001077/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  18. STFC [ST/H001077/1, PP/D003199/1, PP/E000452/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a search for a Higgs boson decaying to two W bosons in p (p) over bar collisions at root s = 1.96 TeV center-of-mass energy. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 3.0 fb(-1) collected with the CDF II detector. We find no evidence for production of a Higgs boson with mass between 110 and 200 GeV/c(2), and determine upper limits on the production cross section. For the mass of 160 GeV/c(2), where the analysis is most sensitive, the observed (expected) limit is 0.7 pb (0.9 pb) at 95% Bayesian credibility level which is 1.7 (2.2) times the standard model cross section.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available