4.8 Article

Search for Supersymmetry in p (p)over-bar Collisions at √s=1.96 TeV Using the Trilepton Signature for Chargino-Neutralino Production

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 101, Issue 25, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.251801

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation
  7. A.P. Sloan Foundation
  8. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  9. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation and the Korean Research Foundation
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council and the Royal Society, UK
  11. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS
  12. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  13. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia and Programa Consolider-Ingenio 2010, Spain
  14. Slovak RD Agency
  15. Academy of Finland
  16. STFC [PP/E000452/1, ST/G502412/1, PP/E002722/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  17. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PPA/A/S/2003/00461/2, PP/E000452/1, PP/E000444/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use the three lepton and missing energy trilepton signature to search for chargino-neutralino production with 2.0 fb(-1) of integrated luminosity collected by the CDF II experiment at the Tevatron p (p) over bar collider. We expect an excess of approximately 11 supersymmetric events for a choice of parameters of the mSUGRA model, but our observation of 7 events is consistent with the standard model expectation of 6.4 events. We constrain the mSUGRA model of supersymmetry and rule out chargino masses up to 145 GeV/c(2) for a specific choice of parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available