4.7 Article

Network quotients: Structural skeletons of complex systems

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.046102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60673133, 60703093]
  2. National Grand Fundamental Research 973 Program of China [2005CB321905]
  3. NIH-NIAMS [P01 AR052915-01A1]
  4. Shanghai Commission of Science and Technology in China [04dz14003]
  5. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B114]
  6. EPSRC, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A defining feature of many large empirical networks is their intrinsic complexity. However, many networks also contain a large degree of structural repetition. An immediate question then arises: can we characterize essential network complexity while excluding structural redundancy? In this article we utilize inherent network symmetry to collapse all redundant information from a network, resulting in a coarse graining which we show to carry the essential structural information of the parent network. In the context of algebraic combinatorics, this coarse-graining is known as the quotient. We systematically explore the theoretical properties of network quotients and summarize key statistics of a variety of real-world quotients with respect to those of their parent networks. In particular, we find that quotients can be substantially smaller than their parent networks yet typically preserve various key functional properties such as complexity (heterogeneity and hub vertices) and communication (diameter and mean geodesic distance), suggesting that quotients constitute the essential structural skeletons of their parent networks. We summarize with a discussion of potential uses of quotients in analysis of biological regulatory networks and ways in which using quotients can reduce the computational complexity of network algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available