4.7 Article

Depth of maximum of air-shower profiles at the Pierre Auger Observatory. II. Composition implications

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 90, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.122006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Comision Nacional de Energia Atomica
  2. Fundacion Antorchas
  3. Gobierno De La Provincia de Mendoza
  4. Municipalidad de Malargue
  5. NDM Holdings
  6. Valle Las Lenas
  7. Australian Research Council
  8. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  9. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)
  10. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
  11. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2010/07359-6, 1999/05404-3]
  12. Ministerio de Ciencia e Tecnologia (MCT), Brazil
  13. Czech Science Foundation, Czech Republic [14-17501S]
  14. Centre de Calcul IN2P3/CNRS
  15. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  16. Conseil Regional Ile-de-France
  17. Departement Physique Nucleaire et Corpusculaire (PNC-IN2P3/CNRS)
  18. Institut Lagrange de Paris
  19. ILP LABEX within the Investissements d'Avenir Programme, France [ANR-10-LABX-63, ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]
  20. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  21. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  22. Finanzministerium Baden-Wurttemberg
  23. Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren (HGF)
  24. Ministerium fur Wissenschaft und Forschung
  25. Nordrhein Westfalen
  26. Ministerium fur Wissenschaft
  27. Forschung und Kunst
  28. Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
  29. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR), Gran Sasso Center for Astroparticle Physics (CFA), CETEMPS Center of Excellence, Italy
  30. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT), Mexico
  31. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM), Netherlands
  32. National Centre for Research and Development [ERA-NET-ASPERA/01/11, ERA-NET-ASPERA/02/11]
  33. National Science Centre, Poland [2013/08/M/ST9/00322, 2013/08/M/ST9/00728]
  34. Portuguese national funds
  35. FEDER funds within COMPETE-Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade through Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Portugal
  36. Romanian Authority for Scientific Research ANCS, CNDI-UEFISCDI [20/2012, 194/2012, 1/ASPERA2/2012 ERA-NET, PN-II-RU-PD-2011-3-0145-17, PN-II-RU-PD-2011-3-0062]
  37. Minister of National Education, Programme for research Space Technology and Advanced Research - STAR, Romania [83/2013]
  38. Slovenian Research Agency, Slovenia
  39. Comunidad de Madrid
  40. FEDER funds
  41. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia
  42. Xunta de Galicia
  43. European Community 7th Framework Program, Spain [FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IEF-328826]
  44. Leverhulme Foundation
  45. Science and Technology Facilities Council, United Kingdom
  46. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-07CH11359, DE-FR02-04ER41300, DE-FG02-99ER41107]
  47. National Science Foundation [0450696]
  48. Grainger Foundation, USA
  49. NAFOSTED, Vietnam
  50. Marie Curie-IRSES/EPLANET, European Particle Physics Latin American Network, European Union 7th Framework Program [PIRSES-2009-GA-246806]
  51. UNESCO
  52. [MSMT-CR LG13007]
  53. [7AMB14AR005]
  54. [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0058]
  55. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1212538, 1153335, 1361172] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  56. Division Of Physics [1460394] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the data taken at the Pierre Auger Observatory between December 2004 and December 2012, we have examined the implications of the distributions of depths of atmospheric shower maximum (X-max), using a hybrid technique, for composition and hadronic interaction models. We do this by fitting the distributions with predictions from a variety of hadronic interaction models for variations in the composition of the primary cosmic rays and examining the quality of the fit. Regardless of what interaction model is assumed, we find that our data are not well described by a mix of protons and iron nuclei over most of the energy range. Acceptable fits can be obtained when intermediate masses are included, and when this is done consistent results for the proton and iron-nuclei contributions can be found using the available models. We observe a strong energy dependence of the resulting proton fractions, and find no support from any of the models for a significant contribution from iron nuclei. However, we also observe a significant disagreement between the models with respect to the relative contributions of the intermediate components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available