4.7 Article

TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 89, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.082001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM)
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY-0757058, PHY-0923409, PHY-0600953]
  4. LIGO Laboratory
  5. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  6. STFC [ST/K005014/1, ST/K000845/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000845/1, ST/K005014/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Division Of Physics
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1104371] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The direct detection of gravitational waves with upcoming second-generation gravitational wave observatories such as Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo will allow us to probe the genuinely strong-field dynamics of general relativity (GR) for the first time. We have developed a data analysis pipeline called TIGER (test infrastructure for general relativity), which uses signals from compact binary coalescences to perform a model-independent test of GR. In this paper we focus on signals from coalescing binary neutron stars, for which sufficiently accurate waveform models are already available which can be generated fast enough on a computer that they can be used in Bayesian inference. By performing numerical experiments in stationary, Gaussian noise, we show that for such systems, TIGER is robust against a number of unmodeled fundamental, astrophysical, and instrumental effects, such as differences between waveform approximants, a limited number of post-Newtonian phase contributions being known, the effects of neutron star tidal deformability on the orbital motion, neutron star spins, and instrumental calibration errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available