4.7 Article

Transverse momentum resummation effects in W+W- measurements

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 90, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.114006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF CAREER [NSF-PHY-1056833]
  2. NSF [PHY1316617]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Physics [1056833, 1316617] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The W+W-cross section has remained one of the most consistently discrepant channels compared to Standard Model (SM) predictions at the LHC, measured by both ATLAS and CMS at 7 and 8 TeV. Developing a better modeling of this channel is crucial to understanding properties of the Higgs and potential new physics. In this paper we investigate the effects of next-to-next-to-leading-log transverse momentum resummation in measuring the W+W-cross section. In the formalism we employ, transverse momentum resummation does not change the total inclusive cross section but gives a more accurate prediction for the p(T) distribution of the diboson system. By reweighting the p(T) distribution of events produced by Monte Carlo generators, we find a systematic shift that decreases the experimental discrepancy with the SM prediction by approximately 3%-7% depending on the Monte Carlo generator and parton shower used. The primary effect comes from the jet-veto cut used by both experiments. We comment on the connections to jet-veto resummation and other methods the experiments can use to test this effect. We also discuss the correlation of resummation effects in this channel with other diboson channels. Ultimately p(T) resummation improves the agreement between the SM and experimental measurements for most generators but does not account for the measured similar to 20% difference with the SM, and further investigations into this channel are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available