4.7 Article

Constraints on Einstein-Æther theory and Horava gravity from binary pulsar observations

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 89, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084067

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-1114374]
  2. NSF CAREER Award [PHY-1250636]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX11AI49G, 00001944]
  4. European Union through Marie Curie Career Integration [GALFORMBHS PCIG11-GA-2012-321608]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Physics [1114374] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Binary pulsars are ideal to test the foundations of general relativity, such as Lorentz symmetry, which requires that experiments produce the same results in all free-falling (i.e. inertial) frames. We here break this symmetry in the gravitational sector by specifying a preferred time direction, and thus a preferred frame, at each spacetime point. We then examine the consequences of this gravitational Lorentz symmetry breaking in the orbital evolution of binary pulsars, focusing on the dissipative effects. We find that Lorentz symmetry breaking modifies these effects, and thus the orbital dynamics, in two different ways. First, it generically causes the emission of dipolar radiation, which makes the orbital separation decrease faster than in general relativity. Second, the quadrupole component of the emission is also modified. The orbital evolution depends critically on the sensitivities of the stars, which measure how their binding energies depend on the motion relative to the preferred frame. We calculate the sensitivities numerically and compute the predicted orbital decay rate of binary pulsars in Lorentz-violating gravity. By testing these predictions against observations, we place very stringent constraints on gravitational Lorentz violation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available