4.7 Article

Stringent constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section from subhalo searches with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.016014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy
  2. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Physics [1125897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dark matter halo of the Milky Way is predicted to contain a very large number of smaller subhalos. As a result of the dark matter annihilations taking place within such objects, the most nearby and massive subhalos could appear as pointlike or spatially extended gamma-ray sources, without observable counterparts at other wavelengths. In this paper, we use the results of the Aquarius simulation to predict the distribution of nearby subhalos and compare this to the characteristics of the unidentified gamma-ray sources observed by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope. Focusing on the brightest high latitude sources, we use this comparison to derive limits on the dark matter annihilation cross section. For dark matter particles lighter than similar to 200 GeV, the resulting limits are the strongest obtained to date, being modestly more stringent than those derived from observations of dwarf galaxies or the Galactic center. We also derive independent limits based on the lack of unidentified gamma-ray sources with discernible spatial extension, but these limits are a factor of similar to 2-10 weaker than those based on pointlike subhalos. Lastly, we note that four of the ten brightest high-latitude sources exhibit a similar spectral shape, consistent with 30-60 GeV dark matter particles annihilating to b (b) over bar with an annihilation cross section on the order of sigma nu similar to (5-10) x 10(-27) cm(3)/s or 8-10 GeV dark matter particles annihilating to tau(+)tau(-) with sigma nu similar to (1.5-3.0) x 10(-27) cm(3)/s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available