4.2 Article

An Estimate of the Incidence of Influenza-Like Illness During the Influenza Pandemic of 2009

Journal

ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA
Volume 51, Issue 8, Pages 373-378

Publisher

EDICIONES DOYMA S A
DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2014.07.009

Keywords

Influenza-like syndrome; Incidence; Estimation; Capture-recapture; Influenza pandemic; Influenza

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The influenza pandemic of 2009 had a great social impact. Many health resources were devoted to the care, prevention and surveillance of this disease. Epidemiological surveillance is based on the reporting of cases of influenza-like illness (ILI) and confirmed influenza cases. The objective was to estimate the true incidence of ILI during the influenza pandemic of 2009. Methods: The capture-recapture method was applied during the month of highest influenza incidence in Castellon. Two notification systems were used: (i) electronic reporting of Notifiable Diseases (ND), and (ii) laboratory-based (LAB) data collection. Estimates were made by stratifying by age group and week. Independence coefficients were calculated for those strata. Results: No dependence was found between stratification variables and the reporting system. A total of 7,181 ND cases and 524 LAB cases were identified, of which 211 were recorded in both systems. The estimated total of cases was 17,785 in a single month. In the study period, almost 4% of people in the area suffered flu symptoms (cumulative incidence), with 1% being affected each day (daily prevalence). The sensitivity of the ND system was 40%, i.e., the percentage of patients seeking primary care. Conclusions: To obtain an estimate of the actual incidence of influenza-like illness in the population during a pandemic period, the number of medical consultations should be multiplied by a factor of 2.5. This factor is lower than that estimated for periods without pandemic alert. (C) 2014 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available