4.7 Article

Number counts and non-Gaussianity

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 88, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.103506

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  2. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  3. Province of Ontario through Ministry of Research and Innovation
  4. Eberly Research Funds of The Pennsylvania State University
  5. Eberly College of Science
  6. Office of the Senior Vice President for Research at the Pennsylvania State University
  7. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  8. Banting program
  9. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  10. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  11. Province of Ontario through Ministry of Research and Innovation
  12. Eberly Research Funds of The Pennsylvania State University
  13. Eberly College of Science
  14. Office of the Senior Vice President for Research at the Pennsylvania State University
  15. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  16. Banting program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a general procedure for using number counts of any object to constrain the probability distribution of the primordial fluctuations, allowing for generic weak non-Gaussianity. We apply this procedure to use limits on the abundance of primordial black holes and dark matter ultracompact minihalos to characterize the allowed statistics of primordial fluctuations on very small scales. We present constraints on the power spectrum and the amplitude of the skewness for two different families of non-Gaussian distributions, distinguished by the relative importance of higher moments. Although primordial black holes probe the smallest scales, ultracompact minihalos provide significantly stronger constraints on the power spectrum and so are more likely to eventually provide small-scale constraints on non-Gaussianity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available