4.7 Article

Study of e+e- → ωπ0 → π0π0γ in the energy range 1.05-2.00 GeV with the SND detector

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.054013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.518.11.7003]
  2. Russian Federation Presidential Grant for Scientific School [NSh-5320.2012.2]
  3. RFBR [11-02-00276-a, 12-02-00065-a, 13-02-00418-a, 13-02-00375-a 12-02-31488-mol-a, 12-02-31692-mol-a, 12-02-31488-mol-a, 12-02-33140-mol-a-ved]
  4. Russian Federation Presidential Grant for Young Scientists [MK-4345.2012.2]
  5. Federal Program Scientific and Pedagogical Personnel of Innovational Russia'' [14.740.11.1167]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cross section for the process e(+)e(-) -> omega pi(0) -> pi(0)pi(0)gamma has been measured in the center-of-mass energy range 1.05-2.00 GeV. The experiment has been performed at the e(+)e(-) collider VEPP-2000 with the SND detector. The measured e(+)e(-) -> omega pi(0) cross section above 1.4 GeV is the most accurate to date. Below 1.4 GeV our data are in good agreement with the previous SND and CMD-2 measurements. Data on the e(+)e(-) -> omega pi(0) cross section are well described by the vector meson dominance model with two excited rho-like states. From the measured cross section we have extracted the gamma* -> omega pi(0) transition form factor. It has been found that the vector meson dominance model cannot describe simultaneously our data and data obtained from the omega -> pi(0)mu(+)mu(-) decay. We have also tested the conserved vector current hypothesis comparing our results on the e(+)e(-) -> omega pi(0) cross section with data on the tau(-) -> omega pi(-)nu(tau) decay and have found that the conserved vector current hypothesis works well within the reached experimental accuracy of about 5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available