4.7 Article

General CMB bispectrum analysis using wavelets and separable modes

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.043512

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. HEFCE
  3. SGI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I000976/1]
  5. Leverhulme Trust
  6. European Research Council under the European Union [308082]
  7. STFC [ST/H008586/1, ST/I000976/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/K00333X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H008586/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/I000976/1, ST/J005673/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [308082] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we combine partial-wave (modal'') methods with a wavelet analysis of the cosmic microwave background bispectrum. While utilizing a wavelet-based estimator, we demonstrate that it is possible-via a change of basis matrix-to express the estimator in terms of partial waves. Our implementation allows one to exploit the advantages of both approaches to produce robust, reliable and efficient estimators which can constrain the amplitude of arbitrary primordial bispectra. In particular the methodology introduced here allows for a change of basis from the space of cubic wavelet statistics to partial waves, which have proven particularly useful for investigating the underlying shape governing the non-Gaussian signal. This will be particularly important for upcoming surveys such as Planck. A key advantage is the computational efficiency of calculating the inverse covariance matrix in wavelet space, producing an error bar which is close to optimal. We verify the efficacy and robustness of the method by applying it to WMAP7 data, finding f(NL)(loc) 35.3 +/- 23.6 and f(NL)(eq) = -160.6 +/- 123.6, after correcting for unresolved point sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available