4.7 Article

Romer time-delay determination of the gravitational-wave propagation speed

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.022001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [0940924, 0969857, PHY-0855371, PHY-1205585, CREST HRD-1242090]
  2. Leverhulme Trust [RF/2005/0104]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Physics [0969857] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0940924] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 1676 Olaus Romer presented the first observational evidence for a finite light velocity c(em). He formed his estimate by attributing the periodically varying discrepancy between the observed and expected occultation times of the Galilean satellite Io by its planetary host Jupiter to the time it takes light to cross Earth's orbital diameter. Given a stable celestial clock that can be observed in gravitational waves the same principle can be used to measure the propagation speed c(gw) of gravitational radiation. Space-based LISA-like detectors will, and terrestrial LIGO-like detectors may, observe such clocks and thus be capable of directly measuring the propagation velocity of gravitational waves. In the case of space-based detectors the clocks will be galactic close white-dwarf binary systems; in the case of terrestrial detectors, the most likely candidate clock is the periodic gravitational radiation from a rapidly rotating nonaxisymmetric neutron star. Here we evaluate the accuracy that may be expected of such a Romer-type measurement of c(gw) by foreseeable future space-based and terrestrial detectors. For space-based, LISA-like detectors, periodic sources are plentiful: by the end of the first year of scientific operations a LISA-like detector will have measured c(gw) to better than a part in a thousand. Periodic sources may not be accessible in terrestrial detectors available to us in the foreseeable future; however, if such a source is detected then with a year of observations we could measure c(gw) to better than a part in a million.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available