4.7 Article

The Upsilon spectrum and the determination of the lattice spacing from lattice QCD including charm quarks in the sea

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.054509

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. BIS
  3. University of Cambridge
  4. University of Glasgow
  5. MICINN
  6. DGIID-DGA
  7. NSF
  8. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  9. EU under ITN-STRONGnet
  10. STFC [ST/H00887X/1, ST/G000581/1, ST/J000442/1, ST/J000434/1, ST/G00059X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G000581/1, ST/J000442/1, ST/G00059X/1, ST/H00887X/1, ST/J000434/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We give results for the Upsilon spectrum from lattice QCD using an improved version of the nonrelativistic QCD action for b quarks which includes radiative corrections to kinetic terms at O(nu(4)) in the velocity expansion. We also include for the first time the effect of up, down, strange and charm quarks in the sea using second generation gluon field configurations from the MILC Collaboration. Using the Gamma 2S - 1S splitting to determine the lattice spacing, we are able to obtain the 1P - 1 (S) over bar splitting to 1.4% and the 3S - 1S splitting to 2.4%. Our improved result for M(Gamma) - M (eta(b)) is 70(9) MeV and we predict M(Gamma') - M(eta(b)') = 35(3) MeV. We also calculate pi, K and eta(s) correlators using the highly improved staggered quark action and perform a chiral and continuum extrapolation to give values for M-eta s (0.6893(12) GeV) and f(eta s) (0.1819(5) GeV) that allow us to tune the strange quark mass as well as providing an independent and consistent determination of the lattice spacing. Combining the nonrelativistic QCD and highly improved staggered quark analyses gives m(b)/m(s) = 54.7(2.5) and a value for the heavy quark potential parameter of r(1) = 0.3209(26) fm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available