4.7 Article

pp → ppK+K- reaction at high energies

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.014026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [DEC-2011/01/N/ST2/04116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluate differential distributions for the four-body pp -> ppK(+)K(-) reaction at high energies, which constitutes an irreducible background to three-body processes pp -> ppM, where M = phi, f(2)(1275), f(0)(1500), f'(2)(1525), chi(c0). We consider the central diffractive contribution mediated by Pomeron and Reggeon exchanges as well as a completely new mechanism of emission of kaons from the proton lines. We include absorption effects due to proton-proton interaction and kaon-kaon rescattering. We compare our results with measured cross sections for the CERN Intersecting Storage Rings experiment. We make predictions for future experiments at RHIC, Tevatron, and LHC. Differential distributions in invariant two-kaon mass, kaon rapidities, and transverse momenta of kaons are presented. Two-dimensional distribution in (y(K+), y(K-)) is particularly interesting. The higher the incident energy, the higher preference for the same-hemisphere emission of kaons. We find that the kaons from the new mechanism of emission directly from proton lines are produced rather forward and backward but the corresponding cross section is rather small. The processes considered here constitute a sizeable contribution to the total proton-proton cross section as well as to the kaon inclusive cross section. We consider a measurement of exclusive production of a scalar chi(c0) meson in the proton-proton collisions via chi(c0) -> K+K- decay. The corresponding amplitude for exclusive central diffractive chi(c0) meson production is calculated within the k(t)-factorization approach. The influence of kinematical cuts on the signal-to-background ratio is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available