4.7 Article

A new probe of the small-scale primordial power spectrum: Astrometric microlensing by ultracompact minihalos

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.043519

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
  2. NSERC
  3. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  4. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  5. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  6. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dark matter enclosed in a density perturbation with a large initial amplitude (delta rho/rho greater than or similar to 10(-3)) collapses shortly after recombination and forms an ultracompact minihalo (UCMH). Their high central densities make UCMHs especially suitable for detection via astrometric microlensing: as the UCMH moves, it changes the apparent position of background stars. An UCMH with a mass larger than a few solar masses can produce a distinctive astrometric microlensing signal that is detectable by the space astrometry mission Gaia. If Gaia does not detect gravitational lensing by any UCMHs, then it establishes an upper limit on their abundance and constrains the amplitude of the primordial power spectrum for k similar to 2700 Mpc(-1). These constraints complement the upper bound on the amplitude of the primordial power spectrum derived from limits on gamma-ray emission from UCMHs because the astrometric microlensing signal produced by an UCMH is maximized if the dark matter annihilation rate is too low to affect the UCMH's density profile. If dark matter annihilation within UCMHs is not detectable, a search for UCMHs by Gaia could constrain the amplitude of the primordial power spectrum to be less than 10(-5); this bound is 3 orders of magnitude stronger than the bound derived from the absence of primordial black holes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available