4.7 Article

Connection of gamma rays, dark matter, and Higgs boson searches at the LHC

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 86, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.075011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. UdeA [IN1614-CE]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by the upcoming Higgs analyses, we investigate the importance of the complementarity of the Higgs boson chase on the low-mass weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) search in direct detection experiments and the gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center measured by the Fermi-LAT telescope in the context of the SU(3)(c) circle times SU(3)(L) circle times U(1)(N). We obtain the relic abundance, thermal cross section, and the WIMP-nucleon cross section in the low-mass regime and network them with the branching ratios (BRs) of the Higgs boson in the model. We conclude that the Higgs boson search has a profound connection to the dark matter problem in our model, in particular for the case that (M-WIMP < 60 GeV) the BR(H -> 2 WIMPs) greater than or similar to 90%. This scenario could explain the gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center observed by the Fermi-LAT telescope through the b<(b)over bar> channel with a WIMP in the mass range of 25-45 GeV, while still being consistent with the current limits from XENON100 and CDMSII. However, after the recent LHC measurements concerning the Higgs, this window has been completely forfended, implying that M-WIMP > M-H/2 and, consequently, ruling out any attempt to explain the Fermi-LAT observations, although still offering a region of the parameter space consistent with the current bounds. Lastly, we show that our model has a Standard Model-like Higgs boson for the regime that M-WIMP > M-H/2, by computing the BRs into bb, gamma gamma and tau tau.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available