4.7 Article

Effective action approach to higher-order relativistic tidal interactions in binary systems and their effective one body description

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 85, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.124034

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gravitational-wave signal from inspiralling neutron-star-neutron-star (or black-hole-neutron-star) binaries will be influenced by tidal coupling in the system. An important science goal in the gravitational-wave detection of these systems is to obtain information about the equation of state of neutron star matter via the measurement of the tidal polarizability parameters of neutron stars. To extract this piece of information will require accurate analytical descriptions both of the motion and the radiation of tidally interacting binaries. We improve the analytical description of the late inspiral dynamics by computing the next-to-next-to-leading-order relativistic correction to the tidal interaction energy. Our calculation is based on an effective-action approach to tidal interactions and on its transcription within the effective-one-body formalism. We find that second-order relativistic effects (quadratic in the relativistic gravitational potential u = G(m1 + m2)/(c(2)r)) significantly increase the effective tidal polarizability of neutron stars by a distance-dependent amplification factor of the form 1 + alpha(1)u + alpha(2)u(2) + ... where, say, for an equal-mass binary, alpha(1) = 5/4 = 1.25 (as previously known) and alpha(2) = 85/14 similar or equal to 6.07143 (as determined here for the first time). We argue that higher-order relativistic effects will lead to further amplification, and we suggest a Pade-type way of resumming them. We recommend testing our results by comparing resolution-extrapolated numerical simulations of inspiralling binary neutron stars to their effective one-body description.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available