4.7 Article

Non-Gaussian structure of the lensed CMB power spectra covariance matrix

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 86, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago [NSF PHY-0114422, NSF PHY-0551142]
  2. Lyman Spitzer fellowship in the Department of Astrophysical Sciences at Princeton University
  3. Princeton Institute for Computational Science and Engineering
  4. Princeton University Office of Information Technology
  5. Kavli Foundation
  6. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-90ER-40560]
  7. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  8. Division Of Physics
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1125897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) encodes cosmological information in the observed anisotropies of temperature and polarization. Accurate extraction of this additional information requires precise modeling of the covariance matrix of the power spectra of observed CMB fields. We introduce a new analytical model to describe the non-Gaussian structure of this covariance matrix and display the importance of second-order terms that were previously neglected. When compared with direct numerical simulations our model captures parameter errors to better than a few percent for cases where the non-Gaussianity causes an order unity degradation in errors. We also provide a detailed comparison between the information content of lensed CMB power spectra and ideal reconstruction of the lensing potential. We illustrate the impact of the non-Gaussian terms in the power spectrum covariance by providing Fisher errors on the sum of the masses of the neutrinos, the dark energy equation of state, and the curvature of the Universe. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123008

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available