4.7 Article

Correlations between cosmic strings and extra relativistic species

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 86, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Basque Government [IT-559-10, GIU06/37]
  2. University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [UFI 11/55]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [FPA2009-10612, FIS2010-15492]
  4. Spanish Consolider-Ingenio Programme [CPAN CSD2007-00042, PI CSD2010-00064]
  5. SGI/Intel
  6. HEFCE
  7. STFC
  8. STFC [ST/H008586/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/J005673/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H008586/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/K00333X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent observation that the cosmic microwave background (CMB) may prefer a neutrino excess has triggered a number of works studying this possibility. The effect obtained by the noninteracting massless neutrino excess could be mimicked by some extra radiation component in the early Universe, such as a cosmological gravitational wave background. Prompted by the fact that a possible candidate to source those gravitational waves would be cosmic strings, we perform a parameter fitting study with models which consider both cosmic strings and the effective number of neutrinos as free parameters, using CMB and non-CMB data. We find that there is a correlation between cosmic strings and the number of extra relativistic species and that strings can account for all the extra radiation necessary. In fact, CMB data prefer strings at a 2 sigma level, paying the price of a higher extra radiation component. CMB data also give a moderate preference for a model with n(s) = 1. The inclusion of non-CMB data lowers the preference both for strings and for the extra relativistic species. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available