4.7 Article

Tidal effects around higher-dimensional black holes

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.024032

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ERC Starting Grant [DyBHo-256667]
  2. FCT-Portugal through PTDC [FIS/098025/2008, FIS/098032/2008, CTE-ST/098034/2008, CERN/FP/123593/2011]
  3. European Community through the Intra-European Marie Curie Contract [aStronGR-2011-298297]
  4. [NRHEP-295189 FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IRSES]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In four-dimensional spacetime, moons around black holes generate low-amplitude tides, and the energy extracted from the hole's rotation is always smaller than the gravitational radiation lost to infinity. Thus, moons orbiting a black hole inspiral and eventually merge. However, it has been conjectured that in higher-dimensional spacetimes orbiting bodies generate much stronger tides, which backreact by tidally accelerating the body outward. This effect, analogous to the tidal acceleration experienced by the Earth-Moon system, would determine the evolution of the binary. Here, we put this conjecture to the test, by studying matter coupled to a massless scalar field in orbit around a singly spinning rotating black hole in higher dimensions. We show that in dimensions larger than five the energy extracted from the black hole through superradiance is larger than the energy carried out to infinity. Our numerical results are in excellent agreement with analytic approximations and lend strong support to the conjecture that tidal acceleration is the rule, rather than the exception, in higher dimensions. Superradiance dominates the energy budget and moons outspiral''; for some particular orbital frequency, the energy extracted at the horizon equals the energy emitted to infinity and floating orbits'' generically occur. We give an interpretation of this phenomenon in terms of the membrane paradigm and of tidal acceleration due to energy dissipation across the horizon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available