4.7 Article

Confronting MOND and TeVeS with strong gravitational lensing over galactic scales: An extended survey

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 86, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083507

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. London Centre for Terauniverse Studies (LCTS)
  2. European Research Council via the Advanced Investigator Grant [267352]
  3. STFC (UK)
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J002798/1, ST/H00260X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. STFC [ST/J002798/1, ST/H00260X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The validity of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) and tensor vector scalar (TeVeS) models of modified gravity has been recently tested by using lensing techniques, with the conclusion that a nontrivial component in the form of dark matter is needed in order to match the observations. In this work, those analyses are extended by comparing lensing to stellar masses for a sample of nine strong gravitational lenses which probe galactic scales. The sample is extracted from a recent work which presents the mass profile out to a few effective radii, therefore reaching into regions which are dominated by dark matter in the standard (general relativity) scenario. A range of interpolating functions are explored to test the validity of MOND/TeVeS in these systems. Out of the nine systems, there are five robust candidates with a significant excess (higher than 50%) of lensing mass with respect to stellar mass, irrespective of the stellar initial mass function. One of these lenses (Q0957) is located at the center of a galactic cluster. This system might be accommodated in MOND/TeVeS via the addition of a hot component, like a 2 eV neutrino, which contributes over cluster scales. However, the other four robust candidates (LBQS1009, HE1104, B1600, HE2149) are located in field/group regions, so that a cold component (cold dark matter) would be required even within the MOND/TeVeS framework. Our results, therefore, do not support recent claims that these alternative scenarios to cold dark matter can survive astrophysical data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available