4.7 Article

Three-body D(D)over-barπ dynamics for the X(3872)

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 84, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.074029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Association [VH-NG-222, VH-VI-231]
  2. DFG [SFB/TR 16, 436 RUS 113/991/0-1]
  3. EU
  4. RFFI [RFFI-09-02-91342-NNIOa, RFFI-09-02-00629a]
  5. State Corporation of Russian Federation Rosatom.''

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the role played by the three-body DD pi dynamics on the near-threshold resonance X(3872) charmonium state, which is assumed to be formed by nonperturbative DD* dynamics. It is demonstrated that, as compared to the naive static-pions approximation, the imaginary parts that originate from the inclusion of dynamical pions reduce substantially the width from the DD pi intermediate state. In particular, for a resonance peaked at 0.5 MeV below the (DD)-D-0*(0) threshold, this contribution to the width is reduced by about a factor of 2, and the effect of the pion dynamics on the width grows as long as the resonance is shifted towards the (DD0)-D-0 pi(0) threshold. Although the physical width of the X is dominated by inelastic channels, our finding should still be of importance for the X line shapes in the DD pi channel below DD* threshold. For example, in the scattering length approximation, the imaginary part of the scattering length includes effects of all the pion dynamics and does not only stem from the D* width. Meanwhile, we find that another important quantity for the X phenomenology, the residue at the X pole, is weakly sensitive to dynamical pions. In particular, we find that the binding energy dependence of this quantity from the full calculation is close to that found from a model with pointlike DD* interactions only, consistent with earlier claims. Coupled-channel effects (inclusion of the charged DD* channel) turn out to have a moderate impact on the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available