4.7 Article

Combined limits on WIMPs from the CDMS and EDELWEISS experiments

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.011102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-9978911, PHY-0542066, PHY-0503729, PHY-0503629, PHY-0503641, PHY-0504224, PHY-0705052, PHY-0801708, PHY-0801712, PHY-0802575, PHY-0855525]
  2. NSERC Canada [SAPPJ 386399]
  3. Department of Energy [DE-AC03-76SF00098, DE-FG02-91ER40688, DE-FG02-92ER40701, DE-FG03-90ER40569, DE-FG03-91ER40618]
  4. Swiss National Foundation (SNF) [20-118119]
  5. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-06-BLAN-0376-01]
  6. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK
  8. STFC [ST/H001026/2, ST/J000671/1, ST/H001026/1, ST/J000663/1, ST/I003371/1, ST/I00338X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I003371/1, ST/I00338X/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001026/1, ST/J000671/1, ST/J000663/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-BLAN-0376] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CDMS and EDELWEISS collaborations have combined the results of their direct searches for dark matter using cryogenic germanium detectors. The total data set represents 614 kg . days equivalent exposure. A straightforward method of combination was chosen for its simplicity before data were exchanged between experiments. The results are interpreted in terms of limits on spin-independent weakly interacting, massive particle (WIMP)-nucleon cross section. For a WIMP mass of 90 GeV/c(2), where this analysis is most sensitive, a cross section of 3: 3 x 10(-44) cm(2) is excluded at 90% C.L. At higher WIMP masses, the combination improves the individual limits, by a factor 1.6 above 700 GeV/c(2). Alternative methods of combining the data provide stronger constraints for some ranges of WIMP masses and weaker constraints for others.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available