4.7 Article

Measurement of K+ production cross section by 8 GeV protons using high-energy neutrino interactions in the SciBooNE detector

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.012009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fermilab
  2. MEXT
  3. JSPS (Japan)
  4. INFN (Italy)
  5. Ministry of Science and Innovation
  6. CSIC (Spain)
  7. STFC (UK)
  8. DOE
  9. NSF (USA)
  10. JSPS [19204026, 20674004, 18740145]
  11. global COE program
  12. Japan/U.S. Cooperation Program
  13. NSF
  14. STFC [ST/F009976/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F009976/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19204026, 18740145] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SciBooNE Collaboration reports K+ production cross section and rate measurements using high-energy daughter muon neutrino scattering data off the SciBar polystyrene (C8H8) target in the SciBooNE detector. The K+ mesons are produced by 8 GeV protons striking a beryllium target in Fermilab Booster Neutrino Beam line (BNB). Using observed neutrino and antineutrino events in SciBooNE, we measure d(2)sigma/dpd Omega = (5.34 +/- 0.76) mb/(GeV/c x sr) for p + Be -> K+ + X at mean K+ energy of 3.9 GeVand angle (with respect to the proton beam direction) of 3.7 degrees, corresponding to the selected K+ sample. Compared to Monte Carlo predictions using previous higher energy K+ production measurements, this measurement, which uses the NUANCE neutrino interaction generator, is consistent with a normalization factor of 0.85 +/- 0.12. This agreement is evidence that the extrapolation of the higher energy K+ measurements to an 8 GeV beam energy using Feynman scaling is valid. This measurement reduces the error on the K+ production cross section from 40% to 14%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available