4.7 Article

Extreme mass-ratio inspirals in the effective-one-body approach: Quasicircular, equatorial orbits around a spinning black hole

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044044

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-0745779, PHY-0903631, PHY-0449884]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [NNX09AI81G, NNX08AL42G, NNX08AH29G, PF0-110080, NAS8-03060]
  3. Division Of Physics
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [903631] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We construct effective-one-body waveform models suitable for data analysis with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna for extreme mass-ratio inspirals in quasicircular, equatorial orbits about a spinning supermassive black hole. The accuracy of our model is established through comparisons against frequency-domain, Teukolsky-based waveforms in the radiative approximation. The calibration of eight high-order post-Newtonian parameters in the energy flux suffices to obtain a phase and fractional amplitude agreement of better than 1 rad and 1%, respectively, over a period between 2 and 6 months depending on the system considered. This agreement translates into matches higher than 97% over a period between 4 and 9 months, depending on the system. Better agreements can be obtained if a larger number of calibration parameters are included. Higher-order mass-ratio terms in the effective-one-body Hamiltonian and radiation reaction introduce phase corrections of at most 30 rad in a 1 yr evolution. These corrections are usually 1 order of magnitude larger than those introduced by the spin of the small object in a 1 yr evolution. These results suggest that the effective-one-body approach for extreme mass-ratio inspirals is a good compromise between accuracy and computational price for Laser Interferometer Space Antenna data-analysis purposes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available