4.7 Article

Measurement of the mass and width of the Ds1(2536)+ meson

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 83, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.072003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  4. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique and Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules (France)
  5. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany)
  6. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (Italy)
  7. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (The Netherlands)
  8. Research Council of Norway
  9. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  10. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (Spain)
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom)
  12. European Union
  13. A. P. Sloan Foundation
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  15. Division Of Physics [0969487] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  16. STFC [ST/H001166/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  17. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H001166/1, PP/E000444/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The decay width and mass of the D-s1(2536)(+) meson are measured via the decay channel D-s1(+) -> (D*+KS0) using 385 fb(-1) of data recorded with the BABAR detector in the vicinity of the Gamma(4S) resonance at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy electron-positron collider. The result for the decay width is Gamma(D-s1(+)) = 92 +/- 0.03(stat.) +/- 0.04(syst.) MeV. For the mass, a value of m(D-s1(+)) = 2535.08 +/- 0.01(stat.) +/- 0.15(syst.) MeV/c(2) is obtained. The mass difference between the D-s1(+) and the D*+ is measured to be m(D-s1(+)) - m(D*+) = 524.83 +/- 0.01(stat.) +/- 0.04(syst.) MeV/c(2), representing a significant improvement compared to the current world average. The unnatural spin-parity assignment for the D-s1(+) meson is confirmed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available