Journal
PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.034506
Keywords
-
Funding
- STFC [ST/G00059X/1, ST/H00887X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00887X/1, ST/G00059X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We compare three different methods to determine the lattice spacing in lattice QCD and give results from calculations on the MILC ensembles of configurations that include the effect of u, d, and s sea quarks. It is useful, for ensemble to ensemble comparison, to express the results as giving a physical value for r(1), a parameter from the heavy quark potential. Combining the three methods gives a value for r(1) in the continuum limit of 0.3133(23)(3) fm. Using the MILC values for r(0)/r(1), this corresponds to a value for the r(0) parameter of 0.4661(38) fm. One of our methods involves using the eta(s) to determine the lattice spacing and to tune the s-quark mass accurately. We give values for m(eta s) [0.6858(40) GeV] and f(eta s) [0.1815(10) GeV] needed to implement this. We show that the eta(s) method by itself is competitive with the r(1) method on an ensemble by ensemble basis and compare the two.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available