4.7 Article

Factorization at the LHC: From parton distribution functions to initial state jets

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 81, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.094035

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-94ER40818]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt foundation
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-94ER40818] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study proton-(anti)proton collisions at the LHC or Tevatron in the presence of experimental restrictions on the hadronic final state and for generic parton momentum fractions. At the scale Q of the hard interaction, factorization does not yield standard parton distribution functions (PDFs) for the initial state. The measurement restricting the hadronic final state introduces a new scale mu(B) << Q and probes the proton prior to the hard collision. This corresponds to evaluating the PDFs at the scale mu(B). After the proton is probed, the incoming hard parton is contained in an initial-state jet, and the hard collision occurs between partons inside these jets rather than inside protons. The proper description of such initial-state jets requires beam functions''. At the scale mu(B), the beam function factorizes into a convolution of calculable Wilson coefficients and PDFs. Below mu(B), the initial-state evolution is described by the usual PDF evolution which changes x, while above mu(B) it is governed by a different renormalization group evolution that sums double logarithms of mu(B)/Q and leaves x fixed. As an example, we prove a factorization theorem for isolated Drell-Yan'', pp -> Xl(+)l(-) where X is restricted to have no central jets. We comment on the extension to cases where the hadronic final state contains a certain number of isolated central jets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available