4.6 Review

A Systematic Review of Generic Multidimensional Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Children, Part I: Descriptive Characteristics

Journal

VALUE IN HEALTH
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 315-333

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.006

Keywords

children and young people; health-related quality of life; patient-reported outcome measures; review

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Library [10/2002/16]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services [10/2002/16]
  3. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care of the South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC)
  4. charity Cerebra
  5. National Institute for Health Research [10/2002/16] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To identify generic, multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for children up to 18 years old and describe their characteristics and content assessed using the International Classification of functioning, Disability and Health Children and Youth version (ICF-CY). Methods: The search strategy, developed by an information specialist, included four groups of terms related to measure, health, children and young people, and psychometric performance. The search was limited to publications from 1992. Five electronic databases and two online specific PROM databases were searched. Two groups of reviewers independently screened all abstracts for eligible PROMs. Descriptive characteristics of the eligible PROMs were collected, and items and domains of each questionnaire were mapped onto the ICS-CY chapters. Results: We identified 35 PROMs, of which 29 were generic PROMs and 6 were preference-based measures. Many PROMs cover a range of aspects of health; however, social functioning is represented most often. Content covered differs both in which aspects of health are assessed and whether individual questions focus on functioning (what the subject can or does do) and/or wellbeing (how the subject feels about a certain aspect of his or her health). Conclusions: A broad variety of PROMs is available to assess children's health. Nevertheless, only a few PROMs can be used across all age ranges to 18 years. When mapping their content on the ICF-CY, it seems that most PROMs exclude at least one major domain, and all conflate aspects of functioning and well-being in the scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available