4.7 Article

Observation of muon intensity variations by season with the MINOS far detector

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.012001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0855429] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  2. Division Of Physics [0970111] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [ncas10007, ncas10009] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H001026/1, ST/H001093/2, ST/H001093/1, PP/E000347/1, MINOS/MINOS+, ST/I002626/1, ST/H001026/2, PP/E000398/1, ST/I002626/1 MINOS/MINOS+, ST/H000887/1, ST/H000887/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [ncas10007] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. STFC [PP/E000398/1, ST/H000887/2, ST/I002626/1, ST/H000887/1, MINOS/MINOS+, ST/H001026/1, ST/H001026/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The temperature of the upper atmosphere affects the height of primary cosmic ray interactions and the production of high-energy cosmic ray muons which can be detected deep underground. The MINOS far detector at Soudan, MN, has collected over 67 X 10(6) cosmic ray induced muons. The underground muon rate measured over a period of five years exhibits a 4% peak-to-peak seasonal variation which is highly correlated with the temperature in the upper atmosphere. The coefficient, alpha(T), relating changes in the muon rate to changes in atmospheric temperature was found to be alpha(T) 0: 873 +/- 0: 009(stat) +/- 0.010(syst). Pions and kaons in the primary hadronic interactions of cosmic rays in the atmosphere contribute differently to alpha(T) due to the different masses and lifetimes. This allows the measured value of alpha(T) to be interpreted as a measurement of the K/pi ratio for E-p greater than or similar to 7 TeV of 0.12(-0.05)(+0.07), consistent with the expectation from collider experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available