4.7 Article

Very large scale structures in growing neutrino quintessence

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.063525

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quintessence scalar field or cosmon interacting with neutrinos can have important effects on cosmological structure formation. Within growing neutrino models the coupling becomes effective only in recent times, when neutrinos become nonrelativistic, stopping the evolution of the cosmon. This can explain why dark energy dominates the Universe only in a rather recent epoch by relating the present dark energy density to the small mass of neutrinos. Such models predict the presence of stable neutrino lumps at supercluster scales (similar to 200 Mpc and bigger), caused by an attractive force between neutrinos which is stronger than gravity and mediated by the cosmon. We present a method to follow the initial nonlinear formation of neutrino lumps in physical space, by integrating numerically on a 3D grid nonlinear evolution equations, until virialization naturally occurs. As a first application, we show results for cosmologies with final large neutrino average mass similar to 2 eV: in this case, neutrino lumps indeed form and mimic very large cold dark matter structures, with a typical gravitational potential 10(-5) for a lump size similar to 10 Mpc, and reaching larger values for lumps of about 200 Mpc. A rough estimate of the cosmological gravitational potential at small k in the nonlinear regime, Phi(v) = 10(-6) (k/k(0))(-2), 1.2 x 10(-2) h/Mpc < k(0) < 7.8 x 10(-2) h/Mpc, turns out to be many orders of magnitude smaller than an extrapolation of the linear evolution of density fluctuations. The size of the neutrino-induced gravitational potential could modify the spectrum of CMB anisotropies for small angular momenta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available