4.7 Article

Matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms: Systematic errors and a new phenomenological model for nonprecessing black hole binaries

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.064016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DAAD [A/06/12630]
  2. FWF Lise-Meitner at the University of Vienna [M1178-N16]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science [D/07/13385, FPA-2007-60220, CSD-2007-00042]
  4. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  5. STFC [PP/F001096/1, ST/H008438/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/F001096/1, ST/H008438/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Division Of Physics
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0757058] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new phenomenological gravitational waveform model for the inspiral and coalescence of nonprecessing spinning black hole binaries. Our approach is based on a frequency-domain matching of post-Newtonian inspiral waveforms with numerical relativity based binary black hole coalescence waveforms. We quantify the various possible sources of systematic errors that arise in matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms, and we use a matching criteria based on minimizing these errors; we find that the dominant source of errors are those in the post-Newtonian waveforms near the merger. An analytical formula for the dominant mode of the gravitational radiation of nonprecessing black hole binaries is presented that captures the phenomenology of the hybrid waveforms. Its implementation in the current searches for gravitational waves should allow cross-checks of other inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform families and improve the reach of gravitational-wave searches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available