4.7 Article

Godel-type universes in Palatini f(R) gravity

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 81, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAPERJ
  2. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa CNPq [479469/2008-3]
  3. Instituto Nacional de Estudos do Espaco (INEspaco)
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do RN (FAPERN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the question as to whether the Palatini f(R) gravity theories permit space-times in which the causality is violated. We show that every perfect-fluid Godel-type solution of Palatini f(R) gravity with density rho and pressure p that satisfy the weak energy condition rho + p >= 0 is necessarily isometric to the Godel geometry, demonstrating therefore that these theories present causal anomalies in the form of closed timelike curves. This result extends a theorem on Godel-type models to the framework of Palatini f(R) gravity theory. We concretely examine the Godel-type perfect-fluid solutions in specific f(R) = R - alpha/R-n Palatini gravity theory, where the free parameters alpha and n have been recently constrained by observational data. We show that for positive matter density and for alpha and n within the interval permitted by the observations, this theory does not admit the Godel geometry as a perfect-fluid solution of its field equations. In this sense, this theory remedies the causal pathology in the form of closed timelike curves which is allowed in general relativity. We derive an expression for a critical radius r(c) (beyond which the causality is violated) for an arbitrary Palatini f(R) theory. The expression makes apparent that the violation of causality depends on the form of f(R) and on the matter content components. We also examine the violation of causality of Godel-type by considering a single scalar field as the matter content. For this source we show that Palatini f(R) gravity gives rise to a unique Godel-type solution with no violation of causality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available