4.7 Article

Galaxy-CMB and galaxy-galaxy lensing on large scales: Sensitivity to primordial non-Gaussianity

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 80, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.123527

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A convincing detection of primordial non-Gaussianity in the local form of the bispectrum, whose amplitude is given by the f(NL) parameter, offers a powerful test of inflation. In this paper, we calculate the modification of two-point cross-correlation statistics of weak lensing-galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy-cosmic microwave background (CMB) crosscorrelation-due to f(NL). We derive and calculate the covariance matrix of galaxy-galaxy lensing, including cosmic variance terms. We focus on large scales (l < 100) for which the shape noise of the shear measurement becomes irrelevant and cosmic variance dominates the error budget. For a modest degree of non-Gaussianity, f(NL)=+/- 50 modifications of the galaxy-galaxy-lensing signal at the 10% level are seen on scales R similar to 300 Mpc, and grow rapidly toward larger scales as proportional to R-2. We also see a clear signature of the baryonic acoustic oscillation feature in the matter power spectrum at similar to 150 Mpc, which can be measured by next-generation lensing experiments. In addition, we can probe the local-form primordial non-Gaussianity in the galaxy-CMB lensing signal by correlating the lensing potential reconstructed from CMB with high-z galaxies. For example, for f(NL)=+/- 50, we find that the galaxy-CMB lensing cross-power spectrum is modified by similar to 10% at l similar to 40, and by a factor of 2 at l similar to 10, for a population of galaxies at z=2 with a bias of 2. The effect is greater for more highly biased populations at larger z; thus, high-z galaxy surveys cross correlated with CMB offer a yet another probe of primordial non-Gaussianity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available