4.7 Article

Renormalization of quark bilinear operators in a momentum-subtraction scheme with a nonexceptional subtraction point

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.014501

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-98CH10886, DE-FG02-92ER40699]
  2. RIKEN BNL Research Center
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [19740134, 20025010]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG), Japan-German
  6. STFC [ST/G000557/1]
  7. EU [MRTN-CT-2006-035482]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19740134, 20025010] Funding Source: KAKEN
  9. STFC [ST/G000557/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G000557/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We extend the Rome-Southampton regularization independent momentum-subtraction renormalization scheme (RI/MOM) for bilinear operators to one with a nonexceptional, symmetric subtraction point. Two-point Green's functions with the insertion of quark bilinear operators are computed with scalar, pseudoscalar, vector, axial-vector and tensor operators at one-loop order in perturbative QCD. We call this new scheme RI/SMOM, where the S stands for symmetric. Conversion factors are derived, which connect the RI/SMOM scheme and the MS scheme and can be used to convert results obtained in lattice calculations into the MS scheme. Such a symmetric subtraction point involves nonexceptional momenta implying a lattice calculation with substantially suppressed contamination from infrared effects. Further, we find that the size of the one-loop corrections for these infrared improved kinematics is substantially decreased in the case of the pseudoscalar and scalar operator, suggesting a much better behaved perturbative series. Therefore it should allow us to reduce the error in the determination of the quark mass appreciably.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available