4.7 Article

Top quark mass measurement in the lepton plus jets channel using a modified matrix element method

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 79, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.072001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PPA/A/S/2003/00461/2, PP/E000452/1, ST/H001077/1, PP/E000444/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [PP/E000452/1, ST/H001077/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a measurement of the top quark mass, m(t), obtained from p(p)over bar collisions at root s=1.96 TeV at the Fermilab Tevatron using the CDF II detector. We analyze a sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.9 fb(-1). We select events with an electron or muon, large missing transverse energy, and exactly four high-energy jets in the central region of the detector, at least one of which is tagged as coming from a b quark. We calculate a signal likelihood using a matrix element integration method, where the matrix element is modified by using effective propagators to take into account assumptions on event kinematics. Our event likelihood is a function of m(t) and a parameter JES (jet energy scale) that determines in situ the calibration of the jet energies. We use a neural network discriminant to distinguish signal from background events. We also apply a cut on the peak value of each event likelihood curve to reduce the contribution of background and badly reconstructed events. Using the 318 events that pass all selection criteria, we find m(t)=172.7 +/- 1.8(stat+JES)+/- 1.2(syst) GeV/c(2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available