4.7 Review

Correlation of CMB with large-scale structure. II. Weak lensing

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043520

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. NASA Office of Space Science
  9. Space Telescope Science Institute [NAS 526555]
  10. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  11. Packard Foundation
  12. NSF [CAREER-0132953]
  13. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0810820] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0810820] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the cot-relation of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) with several tracers of large-scale structure, including luminous red galaxies (LRGs), quasars, and radio Sources. The lensing field is reconstructed based on the CMB maps from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite; the LRGs and quasars are observed by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS); and the radio sources are observed in the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS). Combining all three large-scale Structure samples, we find evidence for a positive cross correlation at the 2.5 sigma level (1.8 sigma for the SDSS samples and 2.1 sigma for NVSS); the cross correlation amplitude is 1.06 +/- 0.42 times that expected for the WMAP cosmological parameters. Our analysis extends other recent analyses in that we carefully determine bias-weighted redshift distribution of the Sources. which is needed for a meaningful cosmological interpretation of the detected signal. We investigate contamination of the signal by galactic emission, extragalactic radio and infrared sources, thermal and kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effects, and the Rees-Sciama effect, and find all of them to be negligible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available