4.5 Article

Giant and pigmy dipole resonances in 4He, 16,22O, and 40Ca from chiral nucleon-nucleon interactions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.064619

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  2. National Research Council of Canada
  3. Unites States-Israel Binational Science Foundation [2012212]
  4. Pazy Foundation
  5. MIUR [PRIN-2009TWL3MX]
  6. Office of Nuclear Physics, US Department of Energy (University of Tennessee) [DE-FG02-96ER40963]
  7. Office of Nuclear Physics, US Department of Energy (NUCLEI SciDAC collaboration) [DE-SC0008499]
  8. Field Work Proposal [ERKBP57]
  9. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  10. computational resources of the National Center for Computational Sciences
  11. National Institute for Computational Sciences
  12. TRIUMF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We combine the coupled-cluster method and the Lorentz integral transform for the computation of inelastic reactions into the continuum. We show that the bound-state-like equation characterizing the Lorentz integral transform method can be reformulated based on extensions of the coupled-cluster equation-of-motion method, and we discuss strategies for viable numerical solutions. Starting from a chiral nucleon-nucleon interaction at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order, we compute the giant dipole resonances of He-4, O-16,O-22, and Ca-40, truncating the coupled-cluster equation-of-motion method at the two-particle-two-hole excitation level. Within this scheme, we find a low-lying E1 strength in the neutron-rich O-22 nucleus, which compares fairly well with data from Leistenschneider et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5442 (2001)]. We also compute the electric dipole polarizability in Ca-40. Deficiencies of the employed Hamiltonian lead to overbinding, too-small charge radii, and a too-small electric dipole polarizability in Ca-40.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available