4.5 Article

Neutrino- and antineutrino-induced reactions with nuclei between 1 and 50 GeV

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014607

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Nuclear effects can have a significant impact on neutrino-nucleus interactions. In particular, data from neutrino experiments with broad energy distributions require complex theoretical models that are able to take all the relevant channels into account as well as incorporate nuclear effects in both initial and final-state interactions. Purpose: We investigate neutrino and antineutrino scattering on iron and carbon in the energy range from 1 to 50 GeV, which is relevant to current and coming experiments (MINOS, NO nu A, and Miner nu a). Method: The Giessen Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (GiBUU) model, which implements all reaction channels relevant for neutrino energies under consideration, is used for an investigation of neutrino-nucleus reactions. Results: Our calculations are compared with the recent NOMAD and MINOS data for the integrated inclusive cross sections. Predictions are made for the differential cross sections for semi-inclusive final states (pions, kaons, and nucleons) for the MINOS and NO nu A fluxes. Conclusions: Nuclear effects in the initial-state interactions may slightly change the inclusive nuclear cross section as compared to the free nucleon ones. Final-state interactions noticeably change the spectra of the outgoing hadrons. In the Miner nu a and NO nu A experiments these effects should be visible in the kinetic energy distributions of the final pions, kaons, and nucleons. Secondary interactions play an important role for strangeness production. They make it very difficult to extract the neutrino-induced strangeness production cross section in experiments using nuclear targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available