4.5 Article

Charged-particle multiplicity and pseudorapidity distributions measured with the PHOBOS detector in Au plus Au, Cu plus Cu, d plus Au, and p plus p collisions at ultrarelativistic energies

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.024913

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US DOE [DE-AC02-98CH10886, DE-FG02-93ER40802, DE-FG02-94ER40818, DE-FG02-94ER40865, DE-FG02-99ER41099, DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. US NSF [9603486, 0072204, 0245011]
  3. Polish MNiSWN [N N202 282234]
  4. NSC of Taiwan [NSC 89-2112-M-008-024]
  5. Hungarian OTKA [F 049823]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Physics [0245011, 9603486] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudorapidity distributions of charged particles emitted in Au + Au, Cu + Cu, d + Au, and p + p collisions over a wide energy range have been measured using the PHOBOS detector at the BNL Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC). The centrality dependence of both the charged particle distributions and the multiplicity at midrapidity were measured. Pseudorapidity distributions of charged particles emitted with vertical bar eta vertical bar < 5.4, which account for between 95% and 99% of the total charged-particle emission associated with collision participants, are presented for different collision centralities. Both the midrapidity density dN(ch)/d eta and the total charged-particle multiplicity N-ch are found to factorize into a product of independent functions of collision energy, root S-NN, and centrality given in terms of the number of nucleons participating in the collision, N-part. The total charged particle multiplicity, observed in these experiments and those at lower energies, assumes a linear dependence of (ln S-NN)(2) over the full range of collision energy of root S-NN = 2.7-200 GeV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available