4.5 Article

Direct reaction measurements with a 132Sn radioactive ion beam

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.034601

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-96ER40955, DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-FG02-96ER40990, DE-FG03-93ER40789, DE-FG02-96ER40983, DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. TORUS Collaboration [DE-SC0004087]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF-PHY0354870, NSF-PHY0757678, NSF-PHY-0555893]
  4. UK Science and Technology Funding Council [PP/F000715/1]
  5. National Nuclear Security Administration under the Stewardship Science Academic Alliances (Rutgers, ORAU, MSU) [DE-FG52-08NA28552]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The (d,p) neutron transfer and (d, d) elastic scattering reactions were measured in inverse kinematics using a radioactive ion beam of Sn-132 at 630 MeV. The elastic scattering data were taken in a region where Rutherford scattering dominated the reaction, and nuclear effects account for less than 8% of the elastic scattering cross section. The magnitude of the nuclear effects, in the angular range studied, was found to be independent of the optical potential used, allowing the transfer data to be normalized in a reliable manner. The neutron-transfer reaction populated a previously unmeasured state at 1363 keV, which is most likely the single-particle 3p(1/2) state expected above the N = 82 shell closure. The data were analyzed using finite-range adiabatic-wave calculations and the results compared with the previous analysis using the distorted-wave Born approximation. Angular distributions for the ground and first-excited states are consistent with the previous tentative spin and parity assignments. Spectroscopic factors extracted from the differential cross sections are similar to those found for the one-neutron states beyond the benchmark doubly magic nucleus Pb-208.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available