4.5 Article

Neutrino reactions on 138La and 180Ta via charged and neutral currents by the quasiparticle random-phase approximation

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.035504

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0077273]
  2. Soongsil University Research Fund
  3. Scientific Research of Japan [20244035, 20105004]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0077273] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20244035] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cosmological origins of the two heaviest odd-odd nuclei La-138 and Ta-180 are believed to be closely related to the neutrino process. We investigate in detail neutrino-induced reactions on the nuclei. Charged current (CC) reactions Ba-138(v(e),e(-))La-138 and Hf-180(v(e),e(-))Ta-180 are calculated using the standard quasi-particle random phase approximation (QRPA) with neutron-proton pairing as well as neutron-neutron and proton-proton pairing correlations. For the neutral current (NC) reactions La-139(v,v ')La-139* and Ta-181(v,v ')Ta-181*, we generate ground and excited states of the odd-even target nuclei 139La and 181Ta by operating one quasiparticle to even-even nuclei 138Ba and 180Hf,which are assumed as the BCS ground state. Numerical results for CC reactions are shown to be consistent with recent semiempirical data deduced from the Gamow-Teller strength distributions measured in the (He-3,t) reaction. Results for NC reactions are estimated to be about 4 to 5 times smaller than the results for CC reactions. Finally,cross sections weighted by the incident neutrino flux in the core-collapse supernova are presented for further applications to the network calculations for relevant nuclear abundances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available